Alle rapporter
wolfandsheeps_displayed rapporterer
#103875: "2-round game with switching sides?"
implemented: Dette forslag er blevet implementeret
2
Hvad handler denne rapport om?
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Foreslag: efter min mening vil følgende forbedre spillets implementering betydeligt
Detaljeret beskrivelse
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
Currently, most combinatorial games on BGA are either not strongly solved (e.g. Chess, Checkers, invented games, and etc.), solved but results in a draw with perfect play (e.g. Reversi, Nine Men's Morris, Quarto, etc.), or solved but negates the player position advantage by employing pie rule or its variant (e.g. Gomoku, Pente, etc.).
However, this game is an asymmetric combinatorial game and is described as a solved game (wolves win with perfect play).
Above a certain level of skills, a single round game is likely to depend on the player position.
So, implementing a 2-round mode where players play each side once might be a good idea.• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v119
Rapporthistorik
13. nov 2023 20:56 • ufm • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:
Some asymmetric games on BGA also have this option (e.g. Memoir '44, Jekyll vs. Hyde, etc.).
13. nov 2023 20:59 • ufm • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:
Also, the tiebreaker will be needed to prevent endless waves of 1:1 ties.
14. nov 2023 14:35 • Jonathan2004 • Udviklerne ønsker flere informationer omkring forslaget:
Thank you for your interest ;)
I think this is a good suggestion.
For now I think I only played 2 games with that kind of 2 round mode :
-Memoir'44 : the game rules state which players get a given number of points in each round, so we understand who is the winner
-Luck Numbers : (not the same kind of solvable game though) again the game rules state which player is the winner in 'tournament' mode
So we need to find a good way to find the winner in this game, do you think the lesser number of moves is enough ?
For example today I see those 2 tables with the same players :
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439270363 megumaru wins in 17 moves
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439275913 Askeladdd wins in 7 moves
=> Askeladdd should be declared winner of this 2 round game ?
I think this is a good suggestion.
For now I think I only played 2 games with that kind of 2 round mode :
-Memoir'44 : the game rules state which players get a given number of points in each round, so we understand who is the winner
-Luck Numbers : (not the same kind of solvable game though) again the game rules state which player is the winner in 'tournament' mode
So we need to find a good way to find the winner in this game, do you think the lesser number of moves is enough ?
For example today I see those 2 tables with the same players :
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439270363 megumaru wins in 17 moves
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439275913 Askeladdd wins in 7 moves
=> Askeladdd should be declared winner of this 2 round game ?
14. nov 2023 14:45 • ufm • Udviklerne ønsker flere informationer omkring forslaget:
Probably. Winning time as the tiebreaker makes sense.
19. nov 2023 11:05 • Jonathan2004 • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:
I am working on it...
19. nov 2023 19:50 • Jonathan2004 • Dette forslag er blevet implementeret:
Added in today's version 231119-1936.
Tilføj noget til denne rapport
Vær sød at tilføje, det du finder relevant for at vi kan løse fejlen i spillet eller forstå dit forslag:
- Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
- Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
