• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?