• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?