• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?