#117504: "Pudding is incorrectly awards negative points"
Hvad handler denne rapport om?
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet
Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljeret beskrivelse
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
-
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
Rapporthistorik
BGG's interpretation(?):
The player(s) with the least number of pudding cards in their tableau, and any player(s) with no collected pudding cards lose 6 points.
Everyone else's interpretation (as far as I'm aware):
The player with the least number of pudding cards loses 6 points, where having zero pudding cards is considered less than having one pudding card.
As far as I can tell, the "including 0" is just to note that you can't get out of the penalty by "not playing" and avoiding collecting any pudding cards.
The example the rules give is:
> Example: Chris has 4 pudding cards,
> Meredith has 2, and Kerry and Andrew
> have 1. Chris scores 6 points. Kerry and
> Andrew both lose 6 points.
This suggests to me BGA is incorrect, otherwise they're being self-inconsistent by treating 1 vs 0 differently from 2 vs 1.
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Tilføj noget til denne rapport
- Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
- Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
