• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?