• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?