#137697: "Bonus Visitors were not distributed."
Hvad handler denne rapport om?
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet
Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljeret beskrivelse
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.
After receiving my 3 visitors, my opponent would have gotten 3 as well, but only had room for 2. Then bonus visitors should have been distributed. I would have gotten only been able to fit 1 bonus visitor. But did not get any.
-
• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete
I have refreshed the page several times and it still shows only 3 visitors when I should have 4 total.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
After receiving my 3 visitors, my opponent would have gotten 3 as well, but only had room for 2. Then bonus visitors should have been distributed. I would have gotten only been able to fit 1 bonus visitor. But did not get any.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
After receiving my 3 visitors, my opponent would have gotten 3 as well, but only had room for 2. Then bonus visitors should have been distributed. I would have gotten only been able to fit 1 bonus visitor. But did not get any.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)
After receiving my 3 visitors, my opponent would have gotten 3 as well, but only had room for 2. Then bonus visitors should have been distributed. I would have gotten only been able to fit 1 bonus visitor. But did not get any.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen
After receiving my 3 visitors, my opponent would have gotten 3 as well, but only had room for 2. Then bonus visitors should have been distributed. I would have gotten only been able to fit 1 bonus visitor. But did not get any.
-
• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e
I have refreshed the page several times and it still shows only 3 visitors when I should have 4 total.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?
After receiving my 3 visitors, my opponent would have gotten 3 as well, but only had room for 2. Then bonus visitors should have been distributed. I would have gotten only been able to fit 1 bonus visitor. But did not get any.
-
• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?
I have refreshed the page several times and it still shows only 3 visitors when I should have 4 total.
-
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?
After receiving my 3 visitors, my opponent would have gotten 3 as well, but only had room for 2. Then bonus visitors should have been distributed. I would have gotten only been able to fit 1 bonus visitor. But did not get any.
-
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
I have refreshed the page several times and it still shows only 3 visitors when I should have 4 total.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Venligst beskriv display problemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
After receiving my 3 visitors, my opponent would have gotten 3 as well, but only had room for 2. Then bonus visitors should have been distributed. I would have gotten only been able to fit 1 bonus visitor. But did not get any.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
After receiving my 3 visitors, my opponent would have gotten 3 as well, but only had room for 2. Then bonus visitors should have been distributed. I would have gotten only been able to fit 1 bonus visitor. But did not get any.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
After receiving my 3 visitors, my opponent would have gotten 3 as well, but only had room for 2. Then bonus visitors should have been distributed. I would have gotten only been able to fit 1 bonus visitor. But did not get any.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v128
Rapporthistorik
It's been a tricky one to reproduce, but I believe it's fixed now. There was an issue with assigning the initial visitors compared to the player vacancies and that would "use up" some of the bonus visitors instead. In my testing since correcting that error, I consistently get the right amount of bonus visitors assigned to the available spaces, especially when other players have full hotels.
Please let me know if you're still seeing errors with this one.
Tilføj noget til denne rapport
- Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
