• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?