#163396: "Text hard to read due to low resolution assets"
Hvad handler denne rapport om?
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet
Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljeret beskrivelse
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. -
• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Safari v18.3
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Safari v18.3
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Safari v18.3
-
• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Safari v18.3
-
• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. -
• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Safari v18.3
-
• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. -
• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?
-
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Safari v18.3
-
• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. -
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Safari v18.3
-
• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Safari v18.3
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Safari v18.3
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Safari v18.3
Rapporthistorik
Tilføj noget til denne rapport
- Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
- Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
