#163615: "Third dominance check. UI shows tie but points awarded as if no tie"
Hvad handler denne rapport om?
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet
Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljeret beskrivelse
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
-
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
Rapporthistorik
Russian was the dominant coalition. You were loyal to Russian.
You had 1pt for loyalty plus one patriot and one prize for three total points.
The Wakhan had 1pt for loyalty plus two prizes and one gift for four total points.
It is correct that the Wakhan score 5 and you score 3. It was not a tie.
The Wakhan only bought the gift the turn before so you may have missed this.
However, the summary scoring for the Wakhan does seem to be wrong. It shows only 3pts for Russian whereas it should show 4pts. The Afghan (2pt) and British (5pt) appear correct.
I’d look at move 68, for when she betrayed a card to gain a Russian patriot. That saw her summary score remain as 1, not increase to 2 as it should. She had only just radicalized that card as her first action in her turn and possibly that caused the error in her tally of influence, but I’m speculating.
Tilføj noget til denne rapport
- Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
- Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
