#169328: "Adela effects resolved in the wrong order"
Hvad handler denne rapport om?
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet
Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljeret beskrivelse
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
does not matter
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
does not matter
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
does not matter
-
• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
does not matter
-
• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
does not matter
-
• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
-
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
does not matter
-
• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
does not matter
-
• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
does not matter
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
does not matter
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
does not matter
Rapporthistorik
Actually, all players as in multiplayer state. I will change for all opponents and after a special state for the active player
It's technically not a bug since the player can only wait the others players to discard but in turn based game, it's not really interesting.
Thanks :)
Tilføj noget til denne rapport
- Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
- Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
