Alle rapporter
#19843: "Either disable "conceed" option OR allow to end the game after conceeding"
Hvad handler denne rapport om?
BGA hjemmeside
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Forslag: Jeg vil mene, at følgende kunne forbedre hjemmesiden betydeligt
Detaljeret beskrivelse
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
As a Seasons player, I find VERY frustrating when an opponent conceed the game near the end. When we work hard on a draft and cannot play it, it removes all the fun of the game. To me, it's actually highly unfair-play to do that.
To fix this frustration, I see 2 options:
- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Not relevant
Rapporthistorik
26. jun 2020 16:35 • compte obelète • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:
30. jun 2020 13:52 • Niluje • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:
My last 40 Seasons game: 7 conceed: 86%, 60%, 97%, 86%, 77%, 100%, 97%
Those are just ragequit (except one who apologized doing this, the only one).
@TheClaudeQc I don't get why this would make players out.
Those are just ragequit (except one who apologized doing this, the only one).
@TheClaudeQc I don't get why this would make players out.
2. dec 2020 18:55 • Wicksweff • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:
When you agree to a game, you should be agreeing to play it to completion.
The Conceed feature should be changed into an Offer to Conceed, that can be accepted or rejected by the other player(s).
The current unilateral conceed option assumes that determining a winner is the only reason to play, but some people play for fun.
The Conceed feature should be changed into an Offer to Conceed, that can be accepted or rejected by the other player(s).
The current unilateral conceed option assumes that determining a winner is the only reason to play, but some people play for fun.
3. dec 2020 1:16 • jda • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:
I agree the current system is frustrating. Changing it to offer to concede would be good.
22. mar 2021 12:06 • Maeves • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:
i agree, you are thinking of your next move, and without notice, the game end because of conceed.
"offer to conceed" and let the other player accept or not will definitly arrange the problem
"offer to conceed" and let the other player accept or not will definitly arrange the problem
24. mar 2021 19:14 • KongKing123 • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:
No thanks. Forcing someone to play out a lost game just for your enjoyment is not the way to go.
27. nov 2022 13:46 • Wicksweff • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:
If you agree to the game, you play to the end.
Conceeding is the online equivalent of flipping the board.
Conceeding is the online equivalent of flipping the board.
27. nov 2022 15:58 • ufm • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:
Qutting is equivalent to flipping the board. Not conceding.
27. nov 2022 16:05 • ufm • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:
Conceding literally means 'admitting their defeat', not flipping the board or ragequitting. The game has ended.
If you want to always play to the final move and scoring regardless the result, just create a group for that.
Players should not suffer from forcibly playing out games already clearly lost.
If you want to always play to the final move and scoring regardless the result, just create a group for that.
Players should not suffer from forcibly playing out games already clearly lost.
20. dec 2023 2:05 • Cos- • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:
I strongly favor the last option: Allow remaining player to finish the game if someone concedes.
3. feb 2024 9:29 • pecan • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:
For me, we have option to resign is the biggest advantage of 2-player game.
No matter for the situation of the game progress. (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=28862 is another suggestion to remove restriction with the timing)
So I downvote these 2 options.
>- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
>- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
And :+1: for the last option, if it means to allow resignation with free timing even in 3+ player games.
>- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game
No matter for the situation of the game progress. (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=28862 is another suggestion to remove restriction with the timing)
So I downvote these 2 options.
>- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
>- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
And :+1: for the last option, if it means to allow resignation with free timing even in 3+ player games.
>- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game
Tilføj noget til denne rapport
Vær sød at tilføje, det du finder relevant for at vi kan løse fejlen i spillet eller forstå dit forslag:
- Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
- Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
