Rapporter • Board Game Arena

Alle rapporter

Saint Petersburg rapporterer

#24803: "Log players decision on using the pub AFTER all players made their choice"

acknowledged: Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det

Hvad handler denne rapport om?

Saint Petersburg #112177136

Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder

Foreslag: efter min mening vil følgende forbedre spillets implementering betydeligt

Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder

Foreslag: efter min mening vil følgende forbedre spillets implementering betydeligt

Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet

Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Rapporthistorik

14. Sep 2020 13:33 • Tikhonov • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:

In the given table number you can see the logging in move #120 and #121 for example.

16. Sep 2020 01:00 • Marcuda • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

Interesting idea. I see you're point. I'll need to look into how to delay those messages.

17. Sep 2020 06:05 • Marcuda • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

This requires a change to the database so it's going to take a little more time to do properly.

26. Sep 2020 15:32 • ShimokitaJer • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

I'll agree this may be a good idea, but is it in accord with the original game? After all, if you were playing this in a physical space someone would need to express their intention first, wouldn't they?

28. Sep 2020 05:13 • Marcuda • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

True, but the difference here is that there is no turn order for Pub. To be most authentic it should probably force turn order for that phase, but in most cases that doesn't matter and would only slow the game down. Also, I'm not sure the rules are explicit here. Perhaps it would be relevant in Arena, but I think this approach would be best of both worlds--faster play while not giving advantage to any player.

Regardless I haven't begun this one yet :)

29. Sep 2020 03:28 • SamHellerman • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

Rulebook is silent on this matter. In physical play, I think players just tend to choose simultaneously. One *might* wait to hear the other announce their move first before choosing, but it's a borderline cheat if they do, and of course a player who is concerned about this problem can simply refrain from announcing until both have paid.

For online, it *could* enforce a turn order, but I see nothing to support that idea in the rules at all. It could use the blue start player first, but being blue start player in the last round is (in a majority of games) probably a disadvantage to begin with. It could be the next player after the last player to "pass" (turn order just keeps going around as it was), but again, nothing in the rules to support that.

I think simultaneous selection is the way to go, and not sharing the information with other players until everyone is committed.

7. Oct 2020 19:40 • Supergravity • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

In our group, we make use of the pub an ordinary action (much like use of the observatory). This eliminates the turn-order ambiguity, but it does make the pub very slightly less valuable b/c sometimes you would need the blue-round income to fully use it.

8. Oct 2020 08:57 • SamHellerman • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

That does make Pub less useful, and has some weird effects. You don't want to allow a "use then upgrade" loophole, so you'd have to gray out (IRL, flip) the Pub to make sure it isn't upgraded for a while. But then when does it become upgradeable again? To stay similar to the real rules, that would be as soon as aristocrats are dealt, but then your Pub and Observatory are unflipping at different times.

Main issue though, being able to funnel blue income straight into the Pub is useful and imho shouldn't be lost even as an option.

Tilføj noget til denne rapport

Vær sød at tilføje, det du finder relevant for at vi kan løse fejlen i spillet eller forstå dit forslag:

Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
Løste F5 problemet?
Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

Annullér Opdatér rapport

#24803: "Log players decision on using the pub AFTER all players made their choice"

Hvad handler denne rapport om?

Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder

Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder

Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Rapporthistorik

Tilføj noget til denne rapport

skift rapport status til:

Hjælp

Bidrag

Navigér

Følg os