Rapporter • Board Game Arena

Alle rapporter

Mapmaker: The Gerrymandering Game rapporterer

#29558: "The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner."

notabug: Dette er ikke en fejl

Hvad handler denne rapport om?

Mapmaker: The Gerrymandering Game #129404798

Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder

Regler: En regel i dette spil er ikke blevet overholdt

Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder

Regler: En regel i dette spil er ikke blevet overholdt

Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet

Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Rapporthistorik

7. Dec 2020 04:01 • TheRandy • Fejlen er ikke blevet reproduceret af udviklere endnu:

The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner.
We both had 4 districts.
We both controlled 1 swing county.
The game assigned the victory to the other payer:
(blue) Forevergm 4 (2)
(red) TheRandy 4 (1)

The output message was: "Number of swing counties won"-
there are only 2 swing counties in the game.

Looking at the rules: "On the rare occasion that there’s still a tie, go to the Supreme Court. Whichever tied player has the fewest total votes for their own party within their own districts wins." My count was: (it might be off a point of 2): 78 blue - 63 red.

7. Dec 2020 04:21 • gkz • Dette er ikke en fejl:

In an `n` player game, there should be `n + 1` swing counties: the `n` 1 tokens for each color and the neutral 0 token.

In this particular game, the blue player won the red 1 and the blue 1 (looks like the red 1 was underneath a meeple). The red player won the neutral 0. Thus the game counted the swing counties correctly.

---

Note that with 2 players, it should be impossible to go to the Supreme Court (since the tie break is majority of the 3 swing counties). With more players, it's possible to have a tie in swing counties. However, in such a case, the game won't actually fall back to this Supreme Court rule, since that was never implemented :). It'll just say that both players ended up winning. I'm also not sure if BGA's framework will allow for multiple tiebreak conditions (just based on the structure of the config), but I could look into it if it becomes a problem.

23. Dec 2020 18:46 • Scott_wmu • Dette er ikke en fejl:

Per the notes above, it looked like the second tiebreaker was never coded (“Supreme Court”). We played a 4 player where is showed a shared victory even though Yellow was the victor per the rules (57 < 65 votes for own in own districts).

boardgamearena.com/table?table=132155273

Just pointing out an occurrence - not sure how often it happens.

23. Dec 2020 19:35 • gkz • Dette er ikke en fejl:

Thanks for the note! Could you actually open a suggestion bug about implementing supreme court? I don't think it'll happen that often, but would be better to track separately from this.

Tilføj noget til denne rapport

Vær sød at tilføje, det du finder relevant for at vi kan løse fejlen i spillet eller forstå dit forslag:

Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
Løste F5 problemet?
Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

Annullér Opdatér rapport

#29558: "The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner."

Hvad handler denne rapport om?

Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder

Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder

Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Rapporthistorik

Tilføj noget til denne rapport

skift rapport status til:

Hjælp

Bidrag

Navigér

Følg os