• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?