• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst beskriv display problemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?