#42737: "Stale games rule should take into account the number of cards"
Hvad handler denne rapport om?
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet
Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljeret beskrivelse
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards -
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v91
-
• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v91
Rapporthistorik
I don't remember exactly the full reasons, but I remember discussing it with Quentin when we designed the feature.
The rule was designed to force the currently winning player to not block the game by repeating the same moves endlessly while the loosing player try to protect their position.
The winning player interest is to give up on the attack to avoid the draw. While the loosing player can be interested in blocking to get a draw instead of a loss.
Tilføj noget til denne rapport
- Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
- Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
