#49152: "final scoring"
Hvad handler denne rapport om?
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet
Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljeret beskrivelse
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.
I had fewer empty estate spaces than the person who was 2nd, but I was 3rd. This is a mistake as I was supposed to be 2nd.
Rules from the rule book: "The player who is the farthest along on the victory point track is the winner. In
the case of a tie, the winning player is the tied player with the fewest empty estate
spaces. Should there still be a tie, then the winning player is the tied player who
went later in turn order." -
• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete
yes
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v93
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
I had fewer empty estate spaces than the person who was 2nd, but I was 3rd. This is a mistake as I was supposed to be 2nd.
Rules from the rule book: "The player who is the farthest along on the victory point track is the winner. In
the case of a tie, the winning player is the tied player with the fewest empty estate
spaces. Should there still be a tie, then the winning player is the tied player who
went later in turn order." -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
yes
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v93
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
I had fewer empty estate spaces than the person who was 2nd, but I was 3rd. This is a mistake as I was supposed to be 2nd.
Rules from the rule book: "The player who is the farthest along on the victory point track is the winner. In
the case of a tie, the winning player is the tied player with the fewest empty estate
spaces. Should there still be a tie, then the winning player is the tied player who
went later in turn order." • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v93
-
• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)
I had fewer empty estate spaces than the person who was 2nd, but I was 3rd. This is a mistake as I was supposed to be 2nd.
Rules from the rule book: "The player who is the farthest along on the victory point track is the winner. In
the case of a tie, the winning player is the tied player with the fewest empty estate
spaces. Should there still be a tie, then the winning player is the tied player who
went later in turn order." • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v93
-
• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen
I had fewer empty estate spaces than the person who was 2nd, but I was 3rd. This is a mistake as I was supposed to be 2nd.
Rules from the rule book: "The player who is the farthest along on the victory point track is the winner. In
the case of a tie, the winning player is the tied player with the fewest empty estate
spaces. Should there still be a tie, then the winning player is the tied player who
went later in turn order." -
• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e
yes
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v93
-
• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?
I had fewer empty estate spaces than the person who was 2nd, but I was 3rd. This is a mistake as I was supposed to be 2nd.
Rules from the rule book: "The player who is the farthest along on the victory point track is the winner. In
the case of a tie, the winning player is the tied player with the fewest empty estate
spaces. Should there still be a tie, then the winning player is the tied player who
went later in turn order." -
• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?
yes
-
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v93
-
• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?
I had fewer empty estate spaces than the person who was 2nd, but I was 3rd. This is a mistake as I was supposed to be 2nd.
Rules from the rule book: "The player who is the farthest along on the victory point track is the winner. In
the case of a tie, the winning player is the tied player with the fewest empty estate
spaces. Should there still be a tie, then the winning player is the tied player who
went later in turn order." -
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
yes
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v93
-
• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
I had fewer empty estate spaces than the person who was 2nd, but I was 3rd. This is a mistake as I was supposed to be 2nd.
Rules from the rule book: "The player who is the farthest along on the victory point track is the winner. In
the case of a tie, the winning player is the tied player with the fewest empty estate
spaces. Should there still be a tie, then the winning player is the tied player who
went later in turn order." • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v93
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
I had fewer empty estate spaces than the person who was 2nd, but I was 3rd. This is a mistake as I was supposed to be 2nd.
Rules from the rule book: "The player who is the farthest along on the victory point track is the winner. In
the case of a tie, the winning player is the tied player with the fewest empty estate
spaces. Should there still be a tie, then the winning player is the tied player who
went later in turn order." -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
yes
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v93
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
I had fewer empty estate spaces than the person who was 2nd, but I was 3rd. This is a mistake as I was supposed to be 2nd.
Rules from the rule book: "The player who is the farthest along on the victory point track is the winner. In
the case of a tie, the winning player is the tied player with the fewest empty estate
spaces. Should there still be a tie, then the winning player is the tied player who
went later in turn order." • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v93
Rapporthistorik
'Game Results' uses tie breaker as follows: (: Tie breaker: Number of unused duchy/estate spaces (*100), then last in turn order ((6-disc spot) * 10 + (4-disc height in disc stack))
Rules say tie breaker should be FEWEST unused duchy/estate spaces (i.e. no most).
I should NOT have won. Both players scored 192. I had 11 unused spaces. Other player had 7 unused spaces.
I was supposed to loose.
Score final
kristaps ditke Kiwinie noljau
Points durant le jeu 186 176 189
Tuiles jaunes 15 36 11
Marchandises invendues 3 0 1
Pièces d'argent 7 0 8
Ouvriers 1 0 2
TOTAL 212 212 211
Cases vides sur son domaine 12 8 5
Game results:
#1 - mogmismo - 222
#2 - CelestinaAdams - 217
#3 - GreySector - 217
#4 - torrquan - 177
GreySector had 7 empty estate spaces and CelestinaAdams had 8 empty estate spaces, so GreySector should have placed second.
drive.google.com/file/d/1pq0L_VsQwfHpXveQ2lqcKaXid3VcJMwS/view?usp=sharing
you could use negative values here "Number of unused duchy/estate spaces (*100)" to correctly weight the final score.
Thanks a lot!
boardgamearena.com/10/castlesofburgundy?table=393972794
time to fix it...
I had more than 39.
1st/2nd place both scored 201, but I was awarded second even though I had 9 unused spaces to 1st places 10.
boardgamearena.com/5/castlesofburgundy?table=458321462
I was robbed of a win.
Table #473522773
Coup #230
Progression 80%
1st/2nd place same score, but I was awarded second even though I had 9 unused spaces . my oponent had 10 empty spaces but was declared winner
Both player same score
I had 7 empty
the other had 15 and I lost.
I should have won.
Both player same score
I had 7 empty
the other had 9 and I lost.
I should have won.
The tie breaker rule is wrong on BGA. :(
I had 8 empty and less than oppoenent.
The tie break rule is still wrong.
(Looks like the rule on BGA is reversed)
C'est dommage ça fausse un peu les arènes et les tournois, mais bon ça reste qu'un jeu.
I think the point scoring system is trying to do the highest number instead of the lowest and they're using the times 100 to make it easier to calculate.
cdn.1j1ju.com/medias/04/f5/f9-the-castles-of-burgundy-rulebook.pdf
Pretty frustrating since this was part of a tournament
It is noted that the English translation has been incorrectly translated, however, I looked at the French rules (as the game Developer is from France) and the translation is the same in French And English. NOT incorrect. Whoever wrote the wiki rules has likely put their personal opinion and not the actual rule.
Please update as this has been an issue for a long time. Thank you.
Tilføj noget til denne rapport
- Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
- Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
