#61176: "Tournaments FAQ is incomplete / outdated"
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet
Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Detaljeret beskrivelse
• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.
n/a• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v99
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
n/a• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v99
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
n/a• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v99
• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)
n/a• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v99
• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen
n/a• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v99
• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?
n/a• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v99
• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?
n/a• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v99
• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
n/a• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v99
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
n/a• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v99
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
n/a• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v99
Rapporthistorik
For example, in a multiplayer-elimination tournament where two out of four players advance to the next round, which two players advance if a game ends in a three-way tie for the win?
Also, is there a different rule in the case where one player is booted so that the remaining three players are deemed to have tied even though one of them might have been way ahead in points?
The software clearly has some rule to deal with these cases (as well as ties in round-robin, Swiss, and single-elimination tournaments). Could a BGA administrator just say what the rules are and add them to the FAQ.
For tie breakers, current practices seem to be:
1) Order of finish in a game that ends automatically due to the allotted time running out for the game is determined by clock time left for each player.
2) For other cases where a tie breaker is needed, either for round advancement in an elimination tournament, or final placement in a non-elimination tournament, age of player accounts is used as the tie breaker. This includes 3+ player elimination games ending due to a player being removed for being out of time, which effectively creates a tie for first place among the remaining players.
Every time a player is disqualified in a game, all remaining players (even those with negative time) are considered tied winners and the ones advancing are chosen inexplicably by the website.
Other users claim the players advancing are the ones with the oldest accounts, others think that they are the ones with the most time remaining, I have noted that they ate the ones who were lucky enough to have been drawn first into the particular game, that is the ones whose names appear first on the particular table.
However, none of the above probable explanations is followed every time.
Hence, it is absolutely vital that:
1. Either the above rule is added to the general Rules FAQ, or
2. An official announcement is made in the Forums, or
3. This rule is clearly stated in EVERY tournament when players apply to participate.
It is too much of a grey zone and it is frustrating to many many players, judging by forum posts.
Thank you.
Tilføj noget til denne rapport
- Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
- Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.