#62195: "When you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, those Conflict Shields should be removed"
Hvad handler denne rapport om?
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet
Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljeret beskrivelse
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. -
• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete
Move #97
When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.
In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
Move #97
When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.
In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. -
• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e
Move #97
When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.
In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. -
• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?
Move #97
When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.
In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield. -
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. -
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
Move #97
When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.
In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
Move #97
When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.
In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.
This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.
This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Mozilla v5
Rapporthistorik
This issue was widely discussed in the 7 Wonders Duel community, but lately the publisher explained in the FAQ o the game that the effect of Anubi and Sabotage DOES influence the Conflict Shields.
www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq
PAGE 18 - SABOTAGE CONSPIRACY
The following phrase replaces the rule concerning the Sabotage Conspiray:
"Choose 1 Wonder constructed by your opponent and return it to the box. It will no longer be used for this game. The affected player doesn’t lose the instant effects previously granted by that Wonder (Coins, Progress tokens, constructed or discarded card, Replay effect, Placement or Movement of Influence cubes)."
With Sabotage, the conflict pawn should move when you destroy a wonder with shields.
Keep up all the excellent work 👍🏻
Here again. Same problem with Anubis. It's especially annoying since this error makes Sabotage much less good than it should be. In this case it didn't deny victory for me, but it could have with less lucky age 3 cards distribution (killing the colossus should have been straight winning).
Tilføj noget til denne rapport
- Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
- Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
