Rapporter • Board Game Arena

Alle rapporter

Just One rapporterer

#67657: "Collective Voting"

acknowledged: Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det

Hvad handler denne rapport om?

Just One #282066620

Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder

Foreslag: efter min mening vil følgende forbedre spillets implementering betydeligt

Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder

Foreslag: efter min mening vil følgende forbedre spillets implementering betydeligt

Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet

Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Rapporthistorik

10. Jul 2022 00:33 • CaptainTenille • Dette forslag er endnu ikke analyseret af udviklerne:

not a bug, just a suggestion

10. Jul 2022 01:00 • KuWizard • Udviklerne tænker ikke at det er en god ide eller at omkostningerne vil være for høje:

That's how it was implemented as a first draft. People from publishing company (Repos Production) played with 7 players and decided that it kills the game pace and slows down it a lot. So they asked to do the next player verification only. Pretty sure they won't decide to change back

10. Jul 2022 01:24 • CaptainTenille • Udviklerne tænker ikke at det er en god ide eller at omkostningerne vil være for høje:

so it's better to have duplicate clues got through?

10. Jul 2022 06:51 • Pompkin • Udviklerne tænker ikke at det er en god ide eller at omkostningerne vil være for høje:

for live games it is easily fixed with a countdown timer of something like 10-15 seconds for all the cluegivers when the words are presented. If nobody clicks the duplicate/invalid clue button in that time game just progress as normal. It will both speed up the average waiting time for approving clues and increase the likelihood of catching errors.

10. Jul 2022 09:00 • KuWizard • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

Ok, timer could save the situation, I'll try to present this idea if more people vote for this one (it's just 1 vote at the moment)

10. Jul 2022 14:14 • CaptainTenille • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

Since it already has been implemented before, can't it just be an option when setting up the game? If the players want it, they just check the box and get the experience that they want.

11. Jul 2022 16:09 • Pompkin • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

another problem with letting just 1 player approve of the clues is that they are very likely to improve one of their own clues that break the rules as they wouldnt give that rule breaking clue in the first place if they know the rules.

11. Jul 2022 16:10 • Pompkin • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

improve=approve

28. Jul 2022 02:16 • FT3 • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

I came here to make the same report, the countdown timer for everyone sounds like a very neat solution to the problem.

11. Sep 2022 10:42 • OutOfHabit • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

I would love to see this change implemented, at least as an option .

Maybe an ability to mark a word as Wrong (X) or as Question (?) (and the rest are ok to keep)

Question lets the group know you want opinions about a word
Wrong (X) means you think it should go

Anyone can choose to just abstain from joining that part of they want,
And probably still on one person to submit it each time, rotating as it does now

26. Oct 2022 14:27 • Livini • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

#311910257

A player cancelled a perfectly valid clue (Shrek) and didn't cancel two identical clues with different (British/American) spelling (Grey and Gray). Mistakes like this could have been avoided if we'd voted collectively.
A countdown timer would be great so it doesn't slow down the pacing!

2. Nov 2022 09:13 • MIB5799 • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

Possible option: Have only 3 players do approval instead of all 6. Still much much better than only one.

Or even just 2 (with rotating tiebreaker like in Similo).

14. Dec 2022 17:45 • bananasplay • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

Make this a table option when creating a game so that players can decide for themselves:
Next player's choice
Collective voting
Any single player chooses (This last one would be especially useful for turn-based games where some players are more frequently online than others--I trust the people whom I play with and they trust me--but it's annoying to have the game slowed down needlessly because the implementation is forcing us to wait on the slowest player).

7. Mar 2024 17:13 • TheInquisitor • Udviklerne er enige om, at det er en god idé, og har intentioner om at arbejde på det:

> Any single player chooses (This last one would be especially useful for turn-based games where some players are more frequently online than others--I trust the people whom I play with and they trust me--but it's annoying to have the game slowed down needlessly because the implementation is forcing us to wait on the slowest player).

This option would be a great help for friends who are just playing the infinite game amongst themselves.

Tilføj noget til denne rapport

Vær sød at tilføje, det du finder relevant for at vi kan løse fejlen i spillet eller forstå dit forslag:

Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
Løste F5 problemet?
Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

Annullér Opdatér rapport

#67657: "Collective Voting"

Hvad handler denne rapport om?

Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder

Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder

Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Rapporthistorik

Tilføj noget til denne rapport

skift rapport status til:

Hjælp

Bidrag

Navigér

Følg os