• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god praksis), kan du bruge en billedhostingtjeneste efter eget valg (snipboard.io for eksempel) til at uploade det og kopiere/indsætte linket her. er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god praksis), kan du bruge en billedhostingtjeneste efter eget valg (snipboard.io for eksempel) til at uploade det og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god praksis), kan du bruge en billedhostingtjeneste efter eget valg (snipboard.io for eksempel) til at uploade det og kopiere/indsætte linket her. er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Hvilken browser bruger du?