#69961: "Yield not offered for newly revealed enemy"
Hvad handler denne rapport om?
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet
Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljeret beskrivelse
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. -
• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete
7
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
7
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. -
• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e
7
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. -
• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?
7
-
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v104
-
• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. -
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
7
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
7
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v104
Rapporthistorik
Tilføj noget til denne rapport
- Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
- Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
