• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?