• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete

Move 220 & Move 223

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e

Move 220 & Move 223

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Hvilken browser bruger du?