• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.

It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.

Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar...

• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.

Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar...

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.

Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar...

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)

It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.

Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar...

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen

It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.

Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar...

• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?

It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.

Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar...

• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?

It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.

Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar...

• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst beskriv display problemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.

Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar...

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?

It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.

Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar...

• Hvilken browser bruger du?

• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.

It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.

Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar...

• Hvilken browser bruger du?