#95801: "Objective abundant not scored properly"
Hvad handler denne rapport om?
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet
Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljeret beskrivelse
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly. -
• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete
Still in game...
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly. -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
Still in game...
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly. -
• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e
Still in game...
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly. -
• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?
Still in game...
-
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v112
-
• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly. -
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
Still in game...
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly. -
• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
Still in game...
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly. • Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v112
Rapporthistorik
Move #51
Progression 86%
Opulent still works the old way - i.e. opponent sold a building but it still counted for Gold spent. Cost me the game!!
Thank you
Move #46
Progression 57%
Still counting sold buildings for the Opulent objective
Move #53
Progression 57%
Opulent Did work as intended. Which surprised us as it hadn't worked last game!!
Tilføj noget til denne rapport
- Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
- Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
