#29018: "2x Multipliers don´t accumulate"
Hvad handler denne rapport om?
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Hvad skete der? Vær venlig og vælg nedenunder
Vær sød at undersøge, om der allerede er sendt en besked om emnet
Hvis ja, venligst STEM for denne rapport. Rapporter med flest stemmer er dem der får PRIORITET!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Detaljeret beskrivelse
• Venligst kopier/indsæt fejlmeddelelsen du ser på din skærm, hvis der er en.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Venligst forklar hvad du ønsker at gøre, hvad du gjorde og hvad der skete
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v86
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v86
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v86
• Hvad blev der vist på skærmen, da du blev blokeret (Blank skærm? Noget af spilbrugerfladen? Fejlmeddelelse?)
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v86
• Hvilken del af reglerne blev ikke respekteret ved BGA-tilpasningen
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Er regel-brudddet synligt i e
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v86
• Hvad var den spilhandling du ønskede at udføre?
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Hvad forsøgte du at gøre for at udløse denne spilhandling?
• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgre at gøre dette (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v86
• I hvilket stadie af spillet opstod problemet (hvad var den daværende spilinstruktion)?
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Hvad skete der, da du forsøgte at udføre denne spilhandling (fejlmeddelelse, meddelelsesstatusbjælke, ...)?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v86
• Venligst beskriv display problemet. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v86
• Venligst kopier/indsæt tekst vist på engelsk i stedet for dit sprog. Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• er der adgang til denne tekst i oversættelsessystem? Hvis ja, er det blevet oversat inden for 24 timer?
• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v86
• Forklar venligst dit forslag præcist og sammenfattende, så det er så let som muligt at forstå, hvad du mener.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Hvilken browser bruger du?
Google Chrome v86
Rapporthistorik
His suggestion is to add a variant in which doublers "add" instead of "multiply". So, two doublers applied to the same word would result in 3x earnings instead of 4x.
I'm happy to implement this variant, since it's endorsed by the game designer. I think the "2x MAX" variant you describe goes a little two far, since it eliminates any benefit of achieving multiple doubler requirements, and thus reduces strategic options.
But I really think 3x the points is still too much.
Check the stats to see how many times a player that gets B and J together loses...
I even considered a "no doubles allowed" pre-game option. That would still be good, IMO.
So, the data I have doesn't indicate that doubler stacking is having a significant effect on win rate. It doesn't disprove it either, of course.
I'm not necessarily ruling out a "2x MAX" variant, but I'd like to start with the designer-approved "doublers add" variant first.
(Since I'm just the developer of this game on BGA, not the game designer, I don't feel comfortable introducing significant rule variants without evidence or approval.)
Tilføj noget til denne rapport
- Et andet bord-ID / træk ID
- Løste F5 problemet?
- Skete problemet flere gange? Hver gang? Tilfældigt?
- Hvis du har et skærmbillede af denne fejl (god øvelse), kan du bruge Imgur.com til at uploade den og kopiere/indsætte linket her.